Subject:
|
Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:37:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2351 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote:
Thanks, Kelly, for your comments about this. I have only one point I’d like to
make:
| |
But I simply don’t agree with the
base concept that if an admin CAN do something bad, they WILL do something
bad.
|
Whereas I think it is inevitable *eventually*. That’s not a slur against admins,
it’s just human nature. But as long as there is recourse to deal with bad
behaviour by admins (as well as non-admins), there shouldn’t be a problem.
I would question the clause:
A person may leave the LUGNET staff in one of four ways:
- Resignation
- Request (and grant) a leave of absence
- Dismissal by unanimous vote of the admin team (minus the staff member in question)
- Dismissal by one or both of the Site Owners
Why require unanimity of the admins, but only 1 site owner? Surely a majority of
admins should be sufficient? One would hope they could reach total agreement,
but one should not assume that will always be possible.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) That was my paraphrasing of the original information I saw about the purpose for the committee, I apologize for not being specific. (...) I'm assuming the "you" is directed at the LTT, and not me personally, so I'll respond as such. The (...) (20 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
90 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
