Subject:
|
Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:29:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1645 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger wrote:
> I think it shouldn't be very hard to implement. Have to add a chaching
> mechanism so that each member's version would be updated no more than
> once an hour, and not at all if they're not currently browsing. It
> would also work as a better gauge of what the community is really
> looking for in the spotlight - could even have the default weights be
> calculated off the average weighing of all the users.
Huh. So, rather than keep an individual's ranked posts, you'd just keep an
"everyone with settings in configuration X" sort of thing. Makes sense. I wonder
if there could be a limited number of configurations to start with, in case it
*is* a big performance hit. Like, only allow settings for a few groups rather
than *ALL* groups to increase the odds of people having matching settings.
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) I wasn't thinking of that, actually, but it could be done. Basically generate a signature of the user's settings, and cache the spotlight for that signature. That would mean that multiple people sharing the same config (skip filter + spotlight (...) (19 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) I think it shouldn't be very hard to implement. Have to add a chaching mechanism so that each member's version would be updated no more than once an hour, and not at all if they're not currently browsing. It would also work as a better gauge (...) (19 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
90 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
