To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12746
12745  |  12747
Subject: 
Re: Legends of Todd
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 23:57:56 GMT
Viewed: 
2525 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
   In lugnet.admin.general, Orion Pobursky wrote:
   In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
   the Admins’ basic idea of how the P&P process would work is essentially what you described here. We write it, work on it. Share it with a few people and get their input, get the document into a finished form and then share it with the public. This process was interupted before it was finished.

I posted this already but this is not the impression that I got from the announcement post or various other conversions with those involved. The impression I got was that the committee was going to generate the P&P and then it would be implemented without a general public discussion period. I think this course of action would be a horrible mistake and only lead to further division here on Lugnet.

Isn’t it possible for people to discuss something even if it is currently being implemented?

Not if the policy being implemented has the effect of inhibiting discussion or making that discussion irrelevant.

Marc Nelson Jr.

Marc’s Creations



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Legends of Todd
 
(...) I'm sorry Marc, but the idea of Admins inhibiting discussion on Lugnet is laughable. When have we ever done that or attempted to do that? Admins cannot force edits or cancels - but can only do so when requested by a member. And if the (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Legends of Todd
 
(...) Isn't it possible for people to discuss something even if it is currently being implemented? Or is it the point that something should be submitted to the community before implementation just for the sake of it? In which case, does the (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

90 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR