To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12657
12656  |  12658
Subject: 
Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:58:18 GMT
Viewed: 
10880 times
  
Dan Boger wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:29:55PM +0000, David Eaton wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger wrote:
> > > I think it shouldn't be very hard to implement. Have to add a
> > > chaching mechanism so that each member's version would be updated no
> > > more than once an hour, and not at all if they're not currently
> > > browsing. It would also work as a better gauge of what the community
> > > is really looking for in the spotlight - could even have the default
> > > weights be calculated off the average weighing of all the users.
> > 
> > Huh. So, rather than keep an individual's ranked posts, you'd just
> > keep an "everyone with settings in configuration X" sort of thing.
> > Makes sense. I wonder if there could be a limited number of
> > configurations to start with, in case it is a big performance hit.
> > Like, only allow settings for a few groups rather than ALL groups
> > to increase the odds of people having matching settings.
> 
> I wasn't thinking of that, actually, but it could be done.  Basically
> generate a signature of the user's settings, and cache the spotlight
> for that signature. That would mean that multiple people sharing the
> same config (skip filter + spotlight weights) will only cause the
> server to generate one spotlight list.

Hmm, some good thoughts. Can we move this discussion to
lugnet.admin.suggestions, and could someone start a new thread there,
capturing the discussion so far?

Frank

FUT: lugnet.admin.suggestions



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
 
(...) Sure - but I thought technical development stuff belongs in .admin.general? Eventually, we'll really need an admin.dev though. (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
 
(...) I wasn't thinking of that, actually, but it could be done. Basically generate a signature of the user's settings, and cache the spotlight for that signature. That would mean that multiple people sharing the same config (skip filter + spotlight (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

90 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR