Subject:
|
Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:49:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2022 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
<snip>
> It was *never* made clear to me that other input was welcome.
>
> If there was ever a softening of the LTT's position, I was never made aware of
> it. Given that Larry was the conduit of communication, and before the LPRV was
> announced, somehow, magically Larry's emails never were sent to me. If Larry
> chose to soften the position and email it through a faulty email portal, am I to
> blame?
>
> Larry attempted to pin the faulty email on me by telling me I needed to check my
> spam protection mechanism. For security reasons, I always view my email through
> Yahoo's web page service. I have whatever SPAM protection mechanism that is the
> default provided by Yahoo. I asked Larry to check his end, and have not heard
> back.
Larry has provided me with convincing evidence that the email breakdown from his
work to me on yahoo was not his doing.
I will ask this though, given that you knew the email conduit was faulty, why
did you continue to use it as a mechanism for communicating with the LPRV?
> Given that I was never informed about a softening of position, the committee was
> a rubber stamp, whether it was intended or not.
Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) <snip> (...) This is a huge point. Proofreaders. My perception of the group was that we were not able to agree or disagree with anything in the document, rather we were to simply point out syntax and grammar mistakes. Given that I openly don't (...) (20 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
90 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
