To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12756
12755  |  12757
Subject: 
Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:18:52 GMT
Viewed: 
2885 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Chris Magno wrote:
Leonard Hoffman wrote:

  If Kevin felt he couldn't in good faith
continue with the committee, then he could have stepped down.  But doing so
publically has created so much of a scene that I can't imagine anyone has had
time for it - they are dealing with this.

-Lenny

re:  your last 5 words

See, this is what people mean when they say transparency. (1)

I have a HUGE post to go public, but i am sitting on it.  WHY, cause out
of respect i am hoping SOMETHING will be said.

I'll say this, I'm still hopeful that the LPRV will pick up where it left off
and get back to work. Maybe now it can. I owe the LPRV a significant sized post
with answers to the questions that were asked about various technical and
intention things, and I hope to get that to the LPRV list by the end of the
weekend.

The work the LPRV needs to do is important. If it can't be effective, can't get
back to that work, and do so in an organised manner though, we'll have to skip
this step in the process.

BUT its been a day or two of silence on LUGNET, AND many more days of
silence on the LPRC list from any admin.

so tell me Lenny, what should I do?  POST?  wait?  how LONG should I wait.

NO ONE is even willing to tell us THAT!!! (2)

No one wants to read every private e-mail from you and Lar regarding the
minutia of lugnet;  BUT it would be nice to let people know whats going
on.

I cant for the life of me understand how reasonable men (the admin) cant
see this.

Perhaps part of the issue with letting people know what is going on is that
every single thing any admin says seems to get picked apart 9 ways from Sunday
by people who are apparently looking for flaws (or looking for buttons to push)
so they can pounce on them?

That tends to make us want to check and recheck everything and then, even after
we did, if something is a smidge wrong and it gets pounced on, we have to
re-redo things.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) Possibly due to the perceived lack of faith from 'the community' towards the admin team in a few areas, such as, and this is one example--dealing with apparent transgressions in an (...) (20 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
 
Leonard Hoffman wrote: If Kevin felt he couldn't in good faith (...) re: your last 5 words See, this is what people mean when they say transparency. (1) I have a HUGE post to go public, but i am sitting on it. WHY, cause out of respect i am hoping (...) (20 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  

90 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR