Subject:
|
Re: LPRV?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:18:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3096 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, David Eaton wrote:
| |
Well, as far as I could tell, the LPRV pretty much just had the privilage to
see the document before it went into effect.
|
Well, I had to pick somewhere to ask this, I chose here...
I would like to know where the “V” came from? I never saw anything that started
with “V” attached to the committee
charter, only the “V” in “review”. Was it just a typo that stuck, or was there
something else added to the name that I missed?
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LPRV?
|
| (...) The V in review. I didn't pick it! Matt did I think because he set up the list (1) I would have went with LPPRC (Lugnet Policy & Procedure Review Committee) Too late now though! 1 - you do-s the work you get-s to picks the acronymie-s (19 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) Well, as far as I could tell, the LPRV pretty much just had the privilage to see the document before it went into effect. And, I'm not opposed to that, really. I mean, I fully recognize and support the desire to strengthen a document before (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
90 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
