Subject:
|
Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:52:57 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1601 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 05:47:04PM +0000, David Koudys wrote:
> I like the solution but the implementation of the solution might be
> prohibitive--the coders would have to weigh in to see how feasable
> that is.
I think it shouldn't be very hard to implement. Have to add a chaching
mechanism so that each member's version would be updated no more than
once an hour, and not at all if they're not currently browsing. It
would also work as a better gauge of what the community is really
looking for in the spotlight - could even have the default weights be
calculated off the average weighing of all the users.
All theoretical though - I haven't looked very deeply into the spotlight
code. If I'm given the green light, I will though.
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) Huh. So, rather than keep an individual's ranked posts, you'd just keep an "everyone with settings in configuration X" sort of thing. Makes sense. I wonder if there could be a limited number of configurations to start with, in case it *is* a (...) (19 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) I like the solution but the implementation of the solution might be prohibitive--the coders would have to weigh in to see how feasable that is. If it requires a complete rewrite of LUGNET's current software, well, that'd be a little crazy... (...) (19 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
90 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
