Subject:
|
Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:03:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2092 times
|
| |
|
|
You mentioned the efficiency of a tiered review process as a reason for
not making everything about lugnet administration public. I don't buy
that. I submit that efficency is irrelavent to the problem at hand and I
beleive that recent events clearly demonstrate that the efficiency of
the current way of doing things (Tiered review?) is pitiful at best : (
David E. brought up that fact that lugnet worked very well under
Todd's light touch in the past. There were no tiers, no committees, no
heavy-handedness, and no secrets. I wish we could return to that, but
the next best thing is probably "peer review." or transparency.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) No personal offense intended - have you ever run a large community forum, or managed people? There is a big difference in how people think things should be run when they have actually had to run things. (...) I think that the LPRV Committee (...) (20 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) You bring up some good and valid points, especially regarding perception of opacity. It's a real issue, and it's something we're trying to improve on. In this specific example (the LPRV committee and process documentation), I do think there's (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
90 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
