| |
In lugnet.trains.org, Tom Stangl writes:
> Methinks it would be easier in the long run to widen your trailer,
> or buy a new one, to run 45x60, rather than the totally oddball 40x65.
>
> ;-)
My point exactly. But it should be pointed out that the trailer can't
practically be widened, it's an enclosed trailer and the walls are part of the
structure and tied into the frame. Buying a new one would mean Conan would have
bought 3 trailers now, the current one cost around 5K, it's pretty big.
Despite that, I think using reasonable module sizes is the way to go. What good
does the extra 5 inches do, really?
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| Methinks it would be easier in the long run to widen your trailer, or buy a new one, to run 45x60, rather than the totally oddball 40x65. ;-) (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
84 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
