| |
In lugnet.trains, Tom Stangl writes:
> Methinks it would be easier in the long run to widen your trailer, or buy a
> new one, to run 45x60, rather than the totally oddball 40x65.
Monitary donations will be expected / accepted then... Oh yea, we'll also
need a bigger truck to *pull* this trailer - it's almost too much for the
vehicle we've got now.
So, if anyone wants to come up with $20,000 to $25,000 for our transportation
system, we're listening.
JohnG, GMLTC
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| (...) Consider 40 by 60 then. That's a nice round module size, it's 2x4 of the big grey 48x48 baseplates with one row of the smaller 32x32 baseplates (in the middle?) I just have to reiterate (and I'll be making the point again on the call) 65 is an (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
| | | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| John Gerlach <john.gerlach@bestbu...ospam.com> wrote in message news:FrvorK.DuA@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) transportation (...) Listen to this one: Rent a U-Haul. You can get them fairly cheap and only need them for the shows. Then you can take as (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| Methinks it would be easier in the long run to widen your trailer, or buy a new one, to run 45x60, rather than the totally oddball 40x65. ;-) (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
84 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
