Subject:
|
Legomodular standards
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:18:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2764 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Gerlach writes:
>
> Having a 'standard' design for
> each
(broken out for emphasis)
> section (table, module - whatever you want
> to call it) limits what we can build - "You must put track here. You must be
> this tall. You must be this size."...
Whew...
Fortunately, that's not what's being advocated. Track spacing and height need
not be the same for all modules. Only for a few. And you've already said you're
picking a standard size in the length/width dimensions. An oddball one.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| In lugnet.trains, Mike Poindexter writes: <snip> (...) <snip> DVD vs. DIVX was not about 'standards', it was about profits. CC bought the sales pitch from the lawyers that they would make more money on DIVX than they could on DVD. DIVX players could (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
84 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
