| |
In lugnet.trains, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke writes:
> In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> > Looks like we will be switching to a 40" x 65" table (all dimensions were
> > based on maximizing our trailer space). Also, we will not maintain a 20
> > brick high level, but move from a minimum of 5 up to 20 and higher.
>
> Would someone please give me the size in studs: I have no feeling for other
> non metric systems....
14 tables, each 40" x 65" (128 studs x 208 studs). Total layout dimensions
should be 672 studs x 1040 studs. Low end will have tracks at 8 (10?) bricks
above the baseplate, high end will have tracks at 20 bricks above the
baseplate. Tentative plans are to have mountains 50 to 60 bricks high at the
'high' end of the layout.
This is all still in the planning stage, we haven't even figured out what
might go where. But, we know it's going to be fun to build!!
JohnG, GMLTC
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| (...) But that means you cant do any small layout by leaving away some middle sections, right? Or do you have some kind of big plates to be put under the lower modules? Are the points of giving track from one edge of a module to the next always the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
| | | GMLTC Storm Watch 2000
|
| Mayor Quimby Mobilizes Town Guard, Calls Emergency Session of Members Storm Watch 2000 (GMLTC Press, Legopolis) Meteorologists at the national weather service have declared Legopolis to be smack within the predicted landfall of Hurricane Neal, now (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
| | | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| Somehow, 65" doesn't sound right to me. Whole baseplates would be best, no? If you are going to go that long, why not bump up to 80" so that you can use standard hollow core doors for table tops. It would be an inexpensive solution... Build On! John (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
| | | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| Methinks it would be easier in the long run to widen your trailer, or buy a new one, to run 45x60, rather than the totally oddball 40x65. ;-) (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
84 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
