To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 4997
4996  |  4998
Subject: 
Re: infrared remote control of LEGO trains using NQC and RCX
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:22:01 GMT
Viewed: 
2244 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:


James Powell wrote:

In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:

IIRC, the big boy was longer than the triplex despite having fewer drivers • <not
that you are wrrrrrr, prolly a bad recall on my part>

According to:
http://www.steamlocomotive.com/misc/largest.html

You are _both_ wrong.

In order for me to be wrong in the way you allege, I would have had to
have alleged that the Triplex was the longest US steamer. I didn't. So
you're wrong about my being wrong. :-)



In order for me to be wrong in the way John alleged, a model of the
Triplex would have to scale correctly. That is, despite the real thing
being shorter than a Big Boy, when we model it, it's likely (BECAUSE it
has so many wheels, and because we don't have many choices for wheel
sizes) that a pure LEGO model of it will inevitably be longer than a
model of a Big Boy to the same "scale". So John's wrong about my being
wrong too.

Nice try, mortals.

N&W's Jawn Henry was the longest steam engine, at 161
feet or so :)

Just as a trivia point, it was the longest steamer, but not the longest
reciprocating, since it was a turbine.

--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.

Note: this is a family forum!


Well done Larry.  The big boy I built accually is shorter than Dan's big boy,
but it is because I scaled the real train schematics to lego grid paper and
worked from there, scaling using the diameter of the driver to match the
technic medium pulley (plus a couple of mm).  I chose the medium technic
pulley because, as far as drivers used from Ben and other steamer builders, it
seemed correct since the big boy's drivers are medium in size compared to
other steamers, like the Daylight.  In doing this little bit of research I
feel my big boy is in proportion better because I am working from real
deminsions.  Also articulation becomes a lot cleaner.
In fact my next project is building the Jawn Henry.  I have already started
scaling the loco and have found many photos and schematics for it.  I just do
not know which era to model it from.  Its first action or when it took on some
modification, like extra punches in the exterior and the extension of the coal
compartment.  What do you think?

Stacy Bledsoe



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: infrared remote control of LEGO trains using NQC and RCX
 
(...) It's funny to speak of a loco that had a lifetime of what, 4 years from acceptance trials to being scrapped, as having eras (!), but I get what you mean. I'd go with whatever is easiest to model, or if it's a tossup, as built. I think there (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: infrared remote control of LEGO trains using NQC and RCX
 
(...) In order for me to be wrong in the way you allege, I would have had to have alleged that the Triplex was the longest US steamer. I didn't. So you're wrong about my being wrong. :-) In order for me to be wrong in the way John alleged, a model (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)

84 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR