| |
The tables used by the NGLTC where built using the original standards published by
the PNLTC. They are a bit narrower (to fit the mini van) but are the same height
and use the same basic principle of connecting together. Only one table of the
entire group ever has four legs attached, the rest share at least one leg from the
other tables. I am working on a way to make some folding legs, since transporting
all those legs and bolting them on is becoming a pain. The nice thing is that they
are very sturdy and can handle any 4 year olds that break past our ropes.
jt
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke writes:
>
> >
> > Next question: is there already a standard for Lego train modules, accepted by
> > most train clubs? Or is there no compability between any of them?
>
> Short answer: No standard
>
> Long answer: There is no standards making body. But there were defacto
> standards...
>
> There WERE two standards, sort of. PNLTC and other "non legomodular" clubs
> seemed to be working to one module standard. At least that's my impression.
> Someone from North GA LTC might be better
>
> GMLTC had set another standard for legomodular by being first. And BAYLTC was
> going to follow it, or at least be compatible.
>
> But as you've seen there's a bit of a sea change underway.
>
> ++Lar
--
---------------------------------------------------------
James J. Trobaugh
North Georgia LEGO Train Club
http://www.ngltc.org
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| (...) Ropes? Huh?? ;-) The GMLTC lets kids get right up to our layout. Touching is discouraged, but it still happens. Yes, we get the occasional *crash*, but we can always rebuild. We had a great one this weekend, kid got his fingers in front of my (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
| | | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| The PNLTC standard has been good to us. Transporting the legs, as James brings up, is a drawback, but they can be easily made with a minimal amount of materials beyond the scrap from the table top. And they are very sturdy. I've sat on the tables (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| (...) Short answer: No standard Long answer: There is no standards making body. But there were defacto standards... There WERE two standards, sort of. PNLTC and other "non legomodular" clubs seemed to be working to one module standard. At least (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
84 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
