Subject:
|
Re: infrared remote control of LEGO trains using NQC and RCX
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 02:17:35 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lar@voyager.net!Spamcake!
|
Viewed:
|
2166 times
|
| |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
>
> In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> >
> > IIRC, the big boy was longer than the triplex despite having fewer drivers • <not
> > that you are wrrrrrr, prolly a bad recall on my part>
>
> According to:
> http://www.steamlocomotive.com/misc/largest.html
>
> You are _both_ wrong.
In order for me to be wrong in the way you allege, I would have had to
have alleged that the Triplex was the longest US steamer. I didn't. So
you're wrong about my being wrong. :-)
In order for me to be wrong in the way John alleged, a model of the
Triplex would have to scale correctly. That is, despite the real thing
being shorter than a Big Boy, when we model it, it's likely (BECAUSE it
has so many wheels, and because we don't have many choices for wheel
sizes) that a pure LEGO model of it will inevitably be longer than a
model of a Big Boy to the same "scale". So John's wrong about my being
wrong too.
Nice try, mortals.
> N&W's Jawn Henry was the longest steam engine, at 161
> feet or so :)
Just as a trivia point, it was the longest steamer, but not the longest
reciprocating, since it was a turbine.
--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
84 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
