| |
In lugnet.trains, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke writes:
>
> Next question: is there already a standard for Lego train modules, accepted by
> most train clubs? Or is there no compability between any of them?
Short answer: No standard
Long answer: There is no standards making body. But there were defacto
standards...
There WERE two standards, sort of. PNLTC and other "non legomodular" clubs
seemed to be working to one module standard. At least that's my impression.
Someone from North GA LTC might be better
GMLTC had set another standard for legomodular by being first. And BAYLTC was
going to follow it, or at least be compatible.
But as you've seen there's a bit of a sea change underway.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| The tables used by the NGLTC where built using the original standards published by the PNLTC. They are a bit narrower (to fit the mini van) but are the same height and use the same basic principle of connecting together. Only one table of the entire (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| (...) (or (...) Thanks Larry for your answer to poor foreigner without knowledge of inches.... Next question: is there already a standard for Lego train modules, accepted by most train clubs? Or is there no compability between any of them? Regards, (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
84 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
