To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 4981
4980  |  4982
Subject: 
Re: New LEGO train realism?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org
Date: 
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 03:49:47 GMT
Viewed: 
2444 times
  
John Gerlach <john.gerlach@bestbuy.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:FruKv4.CA0@lugnet.com...
<snip>

But, our trailer is 76 inches wide,...

You need a bigger trailer!  heehee :)

I would seriously consider sticking with modules of standard baseplates, I
know it is none of my business, but I know what a pain in the rear it can be
dealing with non standard (but sorta compatible) modules.  Ever hear of
jumbo bricks?  They are like regular bricks (the real kind made of clay) but
instead of nominal 4 x 8 x 2-2/3 they are 4 x 12 x 4 or something that 'kind
of' works.  It sucks to try to make them work with all the other modular
systems of modern building technology.  It can be done, but it just plain
sucks.

That's my 2 bits, I won't chime in anymore.

Build On!

John Matthews



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New LEGO train realism?
 
(...) If we just use the grey baseplates, 45x60 or 45x75 would make the most sense. But, our trailer is 76 inches wide, with a door 72 inches wide. With the 65 inch length, we can put the racks into the trailer sideways, and still have enough room (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)

84 Messages in This Thread:


































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR