Subject:
|
Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 00:06:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
323 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > > I would think a gay gene implies that we don't have a free will.
> >
> > Nah. I would say that we still have the ability to overcome the desire given
> > to us by the gene. Just like I might have the urge to cheat on my wife.
> > Genetic? Of course! I mean, that waitress is hot! Why do I think so?
> > Instinct! But I still have the ability (free will) to resist the urge and
> > remain faithful.
>
> I was only speaking from a hypothetical standpoint and not voicing my own
> opinion. My viewpoint is the same as yours, but from the Catholic
> standpoint, you just commited a sin (the thought is the same as the action),
> so what does that imply? :-0
Essentially, it implies that similarly being homosexual is the same as being
heterosexual :) IE if I sinned by thinking that the waitress is hot, I sin
equally by thinking that a waiter is hot. Again, as long as I know not to
act on my desire... Either way you slice it, I don't think it creates a
contradiction in Christianity.
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) I was only speaking from a hypothetical standpoint and not voicing my own opinion. My viewpoint is the same as yours, but from the Catholic standpoint, you just commited a sin (the thought is the same as the action), so what does that imply? (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
97 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
