Subject:
|
Re: Cheap Scientist (Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag )
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 00:39:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
288 times
|
| |
|
|
That is cheap. Hmm... buy it or use the library copy.... decisions
decisions
Scott A wrote:
>
> After out recent new scientist "debate", I got this e-mail from them today:
>
> ==+==
> New Scientist - it's essential reading for anyone with a passion for
> exploration and discovery.
>
> Subscribe today and save 60% off the annual price of USD 140
> - that's 1 year (51 issues) for only USD 51
>
> Subscribe using this link or copy and paste into your web browser
> http://www.ProcessRequest.com/apps/redir.asp?link=XbcijcfgDD,ZbccecfbhcCG&oid=UcjjbCB
>
> Hurry this offer ends 10th December.
>
> ==+==
>
> Scott A
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> >
> >
> >
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> > >
> > > > So, fellow Experts... Which science magazine do you think I should get?
> > > > I'm thinking of something that dumbs things down a tiny bit so as to aim for
> > > > the general population (so Nature and Science are, sadly, out), without
> > > > getting too silly (adios, Discover). I'm really leaning towards Scientific
> > > > American, New Scientist, or Science News... Any critiques? suggestions?
> > > > flames?
> > >
> > > I would favor Scientific American but that's just because I've never read
> > > the other two. I find SA to be a very absorbing read. But it's not a read
> > > while watching TV sort of rag, you need to give it your full attention to
> > > get what the articles are conveying. Kind of spendy compared to less meaty
> > > magazines. But you get what you pay for.
> >
> >
> > We get New Scientist, it tends to be a bit "current" but it is a good read.
> > The range of articles in it means one can spend and afternoon with it, or
> > just a cup of coffee. It does not have the depth of Scientific American, but
> > the detail is sufficient. Its bad point is its passion for large naff (&
> > often irrelevant?) graphics.
> >
> > Must read : Feedback
> > Never read : Jobs... around 1/3 of the mag (beware!)
> >
> > Scott A
> >
> > > PS I thought the recent article on Russia in NG quite fascinating. But 3
> > > generations??? that's depressing.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
