Subject:
|
Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 08:18:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
269 times
|
| |
|
|
"Kirby Warden" <inourimage@msn.com> writes:
> Proving that the gay gene exists is a very serious matter. If it
> does exist, then over 4,000 yrs. of religious doctrine must be
> either changed or simply buried.
Are you implying that possibly apart from the gay gene question, the
4,000 years of religious doctrine is _correct_? Should someone prove
the "gay gene" theory, then we would _finally_ have one case of the
doctrine being incorrect?
Whatever do you mean by "4,000 years of religious doctrine", BTW? Are
you refering to the Bible, the Koran, or other religious sources?
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) Most Christians believe the Bible is indeed correct. Should someone prove (...) I'm not sure how this question is intended to be read. (...) Sorry, everywhere else I've specified Christian religion, since I am most familiar with it. Also, i'm (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| This seems like as good a place as any to jump in. The research i've done shows that a gay scientist found evidence of a gay gene, but no one has been able to duplicate his results. In scientific research, that is a very serious thing. It may have (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
97 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
