Subject:
|
Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 21:30:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
308 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kirby Warden writes:
> Yes, personally I think it would be a detriment for society to once again
> have to force itself to accept the demands of yet another minority group.
Doesn't it depend on what the demands are? What if all they want is a fair
shot?
> How many people would be labled crimminal for believing the Bible?
Probably the same number that are currently labelled criminal for disliking
negros. None. You are free to dislike whomever you want. The problem is when
you start to tar and feather them.
Does that actually seem bad to you?
> This is a potential holy war.
Against whom? Xtians v. the homos?
I'll take my M-16 in pink, thanks.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) That'd be great, except that the demands are not that simple. I really wish I new where to look for the lawsuits, I've heard about them on the news and from Christians, but I've never been able to read about them. (...) It is no longer that (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) It is my understanding that the human brain can "change" according to a person's mental development. If so, then study on the brain to find a common link to homosexuality would be suspect. (...) Handed-ness does not promote a lively-hood that (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
97 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
