Debate : 15088

Off-Topic / Debate / 15088

15087 | 15089

Subject:	Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice... who cares!
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 5 Dec 2001 01:11:24 GMT
Viewed:	1279 times

Ed Jones wrote: > But, after that little time killer, > > It is by birth, it is genetic. It is not nutured. It is not a choice. > There were studies done about 10 years ago of twins and their sexual > orientations. The study included sets of twins who had been separated at > birth or in their early youth. In 99% of the cases, each of the twins was > of the same sexual orientation (either gay or straight). The study included > sets of twins, male and female, of various ethic backgrounds. If I find a > link to the study I will post it. Is the first on cited on this page? (first result returned by google) http://www.worldpolicy.org/americas/sexorient/twins.html very interesting... -chris

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice... who cares!
(...) First of all, IMO, Channel 4 holds no credibility anyway, so a test by them is more luducrious. Having taken the test, I found it very interesting, and self defeating, that you must chose your sexual orientation prior to taking the test. I (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

97 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact