Subject:
|
Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 05:07:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
236 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Robert M. Dye writes:
> in article Gns8LM.n0v@lugnet.com, Kirby Warden at inourimage@msn.com wrote
> on 12/3/01 1:24 PM:
>
> > However, if the gay population is such by mere choice,
>
> A ridiculous notion. If you are straight, are you straight "by choice?" Do
> you somehow feel you would be or are free to choose otherwise?
Why not? Somewhere else in this thread someone posted that more lesbians think
their sexuality is "by choice" than not. Maybe your genes, rather than
specifying absolute sexuality, specify a leaning one way or another - it's
still your choice whether you play along or not.
> And why would you make such a choice to begin with?
Beats me. Why do heterosexuals find the opposite gender sexually attractive,
anyway?
ROSCO (a heterosexual by choice, maybe genes also?)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| in article Gns8LM.n0v@lugnet.com, Kirby Warden at inourimage@msn.com wrote on 12/3/01 1:24 PM: (...) A ridiculous notion. If you are straight, are you straight "by choice?" Do you somehow feel you would be or are free to choose otherwise? And why (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
97 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
