Subject:
|
Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:58:38 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
tmassey@obscorp.comSPAMCAKE
|
Viewed:
|
4627 times
|
| |
|
|
Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com> wrote on 01/11/2005 04:25:15 PM:
> tmassey@obscorp.com writes:
> > Or specify that the input bin must have a technic beam at the front • edge
> > of the input bin to accept technic pins: this is very similar to how • the
> > castle walls connect...
>
> Wouldn't it be better to have this beam be one brick off the tabletop
> (leaving room for a baseplate and spacers adding up to one brick)?
> That would reduce the requirements on a module and 2) reduce the
> amount of levering action.
Yes, yes it would! :)
Tim Massey
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
| tmassey@obscorp.com writes: > Or specify that the input bin must have a technic beam at the front edge > of the input bin to accept technic pins: this is very similar to how the > castle walls connect... Excellent idea. What do you mean, though, by (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
94 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
