To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2745
2744  |  2746
Subject: 
Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:59:43 GMT
Viewed: 
1215 times
  
In lugnet.inst, Don Heyse wrote:
> > 
> > For a given complete physical model there are only so many
> > reasonable ways the model can be represented in the DAT file.  How
> > much style is there really when all you are talking about is the
> > complete model.  There are a few, issues like groups, and sub-model
> > files, but it is a pretty thin set of criteria to judge over.
> 
> I think you're missing the point.  With an LDR file I can move the
> arms and legs of a Mech to see what it looks like in different poses.
> I can spin the gears of a robot even if I don't own all the technic
> parts required to build it.  I can set it spinning in LDVIEW and see
> what it looks like from all sides.  I can look at the furniture inside
> a house after it's built.  There's a lot of play value in an LDR file.
> If I want, I can see what it looks like in a different color, or
> rebuilt with more greeblies.
> 
> I really think ldraw.org should have at least one contest that
> encourages the publication of LDR files.  What better way to get
> people started with LDRAW than to provide them with some really fun
> LDR files to play with.

Actually Don, I agree with all those points and am in favor of authors having
the option to post their DAT/LDR/MPD files along with the images.

My point is that within the scope of a completed model, having a contest on how
the model is expressed in the source files is just too shallow a topic to
justify a contest.  Did you miss my point?

> Ldraw.org is all about the LDR file.

No one understands this better than me.  And the LDR file and all its
capabilities have a huge impact on building instruction results.  The LDR meta
commands needed to express a completed model are trivial compared to what you
need for building instructions.  If there is a BIOTM contest then I'll go look
over there.

> 
> Don

Kevin



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
 
(...) I got the point, but I'm not completely convinced. Anyhow, I really only suggested the LDRotM contest because I'm afraid the model sellers might be influential enough to eliminate even the *option* of publishing the LDR files in the MotM (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
 
(...) Ouch! That hurts. Did you bump your head or something? (...) I think you're missing the point. With an LDR file I can move the arms and legs of a Mech to see what it looks like in different poses. I can spin the gears of a robot even if I (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst)

86 Messages in This Thread:































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR