Subject:
|
Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:27:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1850 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Don Heyse wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger wrote:
> > > I guess I just disagree with you there :) I think it's better to have a
> > > better contest, and perhaps lose a few entries of those who want to sell
> > > their models. The increased quality of the interface is worth it, imo.
> >
> > How about three contests: SotM, MotM and LDR file of the Month?
>
> Hey, there's a nifty idea.
>
> Further, the FoTM (if structured to encourage explanation of techniques and so
> forth in the writeup) could end up being awarded to a file that didn't
> necssarily make a spectacular display but that did demonstrate some really nifty
> technique in parts authoring, submodel organization, or embedding POV or other
> post processor things, or whatever.
>
> In fact, if they were eligible, I might well enter some of my .BAT files (that
> highlight certain techniques about automating rendering) in such a contest. And
> others might enter things like excel spreads for automating primitive generation
> or whatever.
>
> That may be far afield from what you had in mind though.
I could even submit LPub or LSynth source code...... this is getting rather
silly.
I think it needs to be restricted to DAT/MPD format files. Within that scope I
really like the idea.
Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
86 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
