To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2732
2731  |  2733
Subject: 
Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:00:50 GMT
Viewed: 
1451 times
  
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:31:22PM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
I agree with Jacob.  Also, the discussion prior to this post

To which post? Your post?

of course not.  Prior to this thread being posted on lugnet.

[snip]

I disagree. While they may not have been the decision makers (and
again, who is/are the decision maker or makers?) to dismiss their
opinions is, well, dismissive.

Opinions voiced in a private discussion ARE irrelavent once the
discussion goes public.  If the owners of the opinions want to share
them, they're welcome to do so (and have!).

The statement about discussion was presented to show that this wasn't
some idea that Orion just sprung on LDraw but rather one that did get
some considerable discussion first.

I wouldn't call 17 messages, mostly by you, in a span of less than 15
hours "considerable discussion".  I think mentioning it gave the
impression of "we already decided, and just wanted to let you know".

--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
 
(...) That's unjustified (as in, you haven't justified that view, merely stated it) and dismissive and not really a good attitude to take, in my view. (...) um, 6 out of 17 (see (URL) ) isn't really "mostly". It might be a plurality but it's way (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
 
(...) To which post? Your post? (...) All the rest of the thread before your post is irrelevant? I'm not sure that's what you meant to say, you may want to consider a rewording to clarify. (...) I disagree. While they may not have been the decision (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

86 Messages in This Thread:































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR