Subject:
|
Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:36:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1423 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Don Heyse wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Mike Walsh wrote:
> > "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote:
> > > Jacob said:
> > > > > - All submissions will be in LDraw DAT or MPD format.
> > > >
> > > > Makes good sense. And I would prefer that we insist that
> > > > the submissitted files can be published on the LDraw.org
> > > > site.
> > >
> > > I think this is an unreasonable restriction. I'd be interested in
> > > understanding why this is something that should be insisted on. In
> > > the offline discussions prior to presenting this proposal and
> > > elsewhere in the thread, there seem to be a number of people who
> > > don't think this restriction is reasonable or necessary.
> >
> > I too think this is an unreasonable restriction. It has been a
> > while since I have submitted anything but if should this become a
> > requirement, it will probably prevent me from ever submitting
> > something again.
>
> How do you feel about requiring the LDR file in order to generate
> standardized pics, but keeping the publishing of the LDR file itself
> optional? Would that also prevent you from submitting?
I am not so keen on it, it sort of smacks of potential discrimination against
entries that choose not to do so. If we are going for a level playing field
let's get completely level.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
86 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
