LDraw (www.ldraw.org) : 2737


CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2737	2736 \| 2738

Subject:	Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:03:26 GMT
Viewed:	1625 times

In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger wrote: > I guess I just disagree with you there :) I think it's better to have a > better contest, and perhaps lose a few entries of those who want to sell > their models. The increased quality of the interface is worth it, imo. How about three contests: SotM, MotM and LDR file of the Month?

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) Hey, there's a nifty idea. Further, the FoTM (if structured to encourage explanation of techniques and so forth in the writeup) could end up being awarded to a file that didn't necssarily make a spectacular display but that did demonstrate (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) Don, I thought about this for a while and have decided to retract my positive swing on this. The whole, dat required or not discussion is somewhat moot IMHO. For a given complete physical model there are only so many reasonable ways the model (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) I guess I just disagree with you there :) I think it's better to have a better contest, and perhaps lose a few entries of those who want to sell their models. The increased quality of the interface is worth it, imo. (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

86 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search