Subject:
|
Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:55:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
930 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Anders Isaksson wrote:
> Orion Pobursky wrote:
> > After formal running the MOTM contest for a month, I've becomed
> > concerned with the fairness of the contest.
>
> If you feel that POV rendering gives too many degrees of freedom, why not
> define MOTM as L3LAB, Ortographic, renderings. Then there's no discussion of
> landscape, sky, Anton Raves' parts, etc. etc.
>
> L3LAB rendering also shows the construction of the model better than POV.
>
> I don't think there's any need for camera restrictions in this case, let the
> builder select his favourite view(s) (of course, this makes it possible to
> only build half models, but we do that for real too, right?).
>
> --
> Anders Isaksson, Sweden
> BlockCAD: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
> Gallery: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery/index.htm
I thought about mandating one specific program but then I realized that this may
limit the submissions from those who are unwilling/unable to install the
specified program on their machine. This is why I liked Larry's idea to submit
the DAT code instead and to have the contest coordinator do the renders. This
way, if the contest coordinator wanted to render all the submissions in full
radiosity with LGEO and LUGNET's color includes, it would be allowed. I want
uniformity of look not restiction to one specific program.
I also think it would be neat if each month's contest showcased a different
rendering program.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
86 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
