Subject:
|
Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Sun, 4 Jan 2004 11:43:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
916 times
|
| |
|
|
Orion Pobursky wrote:
> After formal running the MOTM contest for a month, I've becomed
> concerned with the fairness of the contest.
If you feel that POV rendering gives too many degrees of freedom, why not
define MOTM as L3LAB, Ortographic, renderings. Then there's no discussion of
landscape, sky, Anton Raves' parts, etc. etc.
L3LAB rendering also shows the construction of the model better than POV.
I don't think there's any need for camera restrictions in this case, let the
builder select his favourite view(s) (of course, this makes it possible to
only build half models, but we do that for real too, right?).
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
Gallery: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery/index.htm
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
86 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
