| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Allan Bedford writes:
> > In lugnet.lego.direct, Benjamin Medinets writes:
> > > In lugnet.lego.direct, Allan Bedford writes:
> > > > In lugnet.lego.direct, Tim Courtney writes:
> > > > How many of us on LUGNET make it a point to visit LEGO.com regularly?
>
> > I agree......I visit the site just to see if there is any update...which
> > to me is sad, because they rarely do. It seems to me they spent big bucks
> > implementing a decent web site, but decided to make do with sporadic updates.
>
> The front page of LEGO.com should be updated no less than once a week, and
> preferably more often. How many of us enjoy CNN.com, or CANOE.com or
> LUGNET.com because the content changes so regularly? LEGO should make their
> website *the* destination for LEGO fans on the web.
I'll agree that lego.com isn't terribly interesting. . .the only part I might
have been interested in was looking at the Castle stuff, which specifically is
not viewable without going through a Flash waste-of-time (which doesn't seem to
like the version of Flash I have installed, anyway).
But what I might be interested in is shop.lego.com. Now, that front page never
changes. . .it's always asking for my country. . .BECAUSE WHATEVER MENTALLY
********* ***** BUILT THE THING HAS A COOKIE FETISH and has no interest in
letting you past the first page. The Lego Corporation: selflessly saving me
money.
TWS Garrison
Note that since LD is in charge of the Lego Website this conversation *is*
on-topic for this group. . .but I think it would be more appropriate to the
intent of lugnet.lego.direct if there were a different group dedicated to
discussions of the lego.com pages and their problems.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
80 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
