Subject:
|
Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:55:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2094 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Mike Walsh writes:
> This isn't completely true. The 2002 catalog scans were provided to FBTB
> (http://www.fbtb.net) and announced there first. Tim Saupe then posted
> their existance here on LUGNET. Based on the watermark on the catalog
> images I inferred that LD provided the images to Tim. Why they would do
> that as opposed to posting them on their own web site is beyond me.
Tim may correct me (don't know if he reads this board, don't care enough to
X-post it), but I'm pretty sure the catalog came out of a FBTB reader's
Darth Maul or other new SW set, which was then mailed to Tim. The watermark
is just Tim's usual courtesy towards TLC.
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
| "Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:Go5y2L.5I5@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) trying (...) distribution (...) [ ... snipped ... ] This isn't completely true. The 2002 catalog scans were provided to FBTB (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
80 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
