Subject:
|
Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 15:29:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1416 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Jack Gregory writes:
> Anyway, I vote for more light gray. Normal and reverse slopes, etc.
I agree. A whole bunch of trees aren't much good if you don't have enough
bricks to build a building around which to put your trees.
> Certainly would have expected these to come out before a new color like sand
> red. There clearly couldn't have been demand for that.
Oh, I don't know that I agree with this statement. To my eye, the color
looks somewhat like faded old brick (a la turn-of-the-century building). At
least it looks a lot more like brick than the traditional 'red' LEGO brick.
I think the new colors are fine, but if not produced in reasonably priced
quantities of basic bricks, then they aren't much more useful than... more
trees.
Allan B.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: WHY SO LONG ON Light Gray?
|
| Allan Bedford <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:Go31pr.3KE@lugnet.com... (...) sand (...) At (...) brick. (...) My point was that there couldn't have been demand for a color that we didn't know about, whereas there is clearly (...) (23 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
| Although I am patient, I must agree that the lack of light gray bulk packs surprises me. I would by many pounds of the stuff. But I have always assumed that my desires do not reflect the true sweet spot -- though I figured the star wars, castle, and (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
80 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
