Subject:
|
Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:35:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
258 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> > > Correct, but I'm pretty sure that you would have to go pretty far down the
> > > pike in order to get to a {Democrat}, which is really what this whole thing
> > > is all about (partisan politics).
> >
> > I love how you minimize {AMERICANS DYING} on foreign soil and {WAR} in
> > general as mere partisan politics!
>
> Gad, you are obtuse. I love how {you} minimize {1,000s OF AMERICANS} who
> died on {OUR} soil! There is a very real threat out there, whether you
> choose to acknowledge it or not. We may never know the results of the
> pre-emptive deposing of SH, but I'd rather be a little safe than sorry.
I must remind the reader that no credible link has been shown to exist between
Al-qaeda and Saddam Hussein, so any references to "{1,000s of AMERICANS} who
died on {OUR} soil" are irrelevant to the issue of Dubya's decision to send
thousands of US citizens to Iraq. To assert, with no evidence, that a linkage
or equivalence between Iraq and Al-qaeda is simple xenophobia
Further, any would-be-credible link that might now be "found" between Iraq and
Al-qaeda would be 100% suspect, given what we know of Dubya's handling of
intelligence data, as well as his willingness to omit certain facts when
presenting a case.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
81 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
