Debate : 21511


Off-Topic / Debate / 21511	21510 \| 21512

Subject:	Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2003 23:47:18 GMT
Viewed:	193 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:

I believe that the perceived threat was never from the Iraqi military itself, but from the proliferation of WMD from SH’s regime to terrorist elements such as Al Qaeda.

Uh-huh. You have a link for that, John? I thought not...There is no proof to support any such allegations. That lack of proof is the very issue under discussion.

So you deny that SH supported terrorists? How about the little stipend he offered families to have them sacrifice their children as human incendiary devices?

Please refrain from responding unless you can say something substantive.

“How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?”

Thanks for all of the “substance”.

JOHN

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
(...) the point isn't who supported terrorists and who didn't. I mean, Bush Sr helped train Osama! Reagan helped fund the mujaheddin, the religious warriors who later evolved into the Taliban! And yes SH supported suicide bombers. But specifically (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

		Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
(...) There is no need or will to deny it; I at least won't bother. However, you'll find the gap between funding a sustained terrorist action and supplying WMD to those terrorists to be very, very wide. If you can link WMD and supporting terrorists (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
(...) Uh-huh. You have a link for that, John? I thought not...There is no proof to support any such allegations. That lack of proof is the very issue under discussion. The president spoke in terms of dead certainties and has come up empty-handed. (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

81 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search