Subject:
|
Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:59:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
366 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
Snipped a lot of stuff to focus on a couple of bits...
|
|
| |
| |
| |
The problem is we need a consistent foreign policy regardless of what that
policy is.
|
Well yes, we need a consistent foreign policy but certain foreign policies,
even if consistent, are not very good ones to have.
|
But they are still better than the inconsistent mess we have now.
|
Some are and some aren’t. A policy that said we would consistently attack
(with nuclear weapons) any country that had a leader that said “Bush is a
weenie” would be indeed consistent, but worse than what we have now.
|
Well at least that would be consistent. :-D Seriously though I see what your
getting at.
| |
| |
Why does
the media keep referring to the troops in Iraq as the “occupation force”?
|
Because they’re a “force” which is present in a defeated opponent, therefore
an “occupying” force. Why? What would *you* call them? I find nothing to
object about w.r.t. that particular usage.
|
I was simply wondering why we are calling them that when prior to the war Bush &
company stated we were not going to occupy the country for the sake of stealing
oil.
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
81 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
