Subject:
|
Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:11:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
223 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
|
White House lied about Saddam threat
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4709366,00.html
My other question is this: why is this such big news everywhere else, but not
in the U.S.? Blair is in a world of **** back in his country, why is Shrub so
comfortable here?
Seriously, when are we going to wake up and smell the corruption?
|
Tell you what froggy, if you want GWB thrown out, why not take a page from the
California playbook. Obviously you feel very strongly that Bush has not been a
good president, and your feelings run very deep. Why not start a campaign to
recall the man, or if there is an existing campaign, offer to help in some way.
Here in California we have a man who is possibly the worst governor in US
history, definitely the worst governor in California in a decade. The gumby
looking Joe Gray Davis has a 20% approval rating. Several concerned citizens
have united in a recall effort, and just this week they announced that they had
gathered the 1.2 million signatures required to get the recall measure on the
ballot. I personally have not seen California voters as excited about anything
in a long time; the rumor that Arnold Schwarzenegger might run for the job
hasnt hurt.
So in between your surfing of anti-Republican websites, and foreign news
organizations fairly biased against the US, you might help organize a national
recall campaign. Then you could truly see how many like minded Americans there
are. I imagine you may be disappointed to find that many support the current
administration. You could also wait until next November when GWB is up for
reelection, but seeing the amount of campaign dollars he has collected in spite
of a silly campaign finance reform law, and seeing how little money the Democrat
hopefuls have collected, I dare to say you may be disappointed then too.
As to your article, I must have missed the shift of responsibility, when did it
become the coalitions responsibility to prove Hussein had WMDs? We know he had
them, he admitted to having them, then failed to adequately prove what had
happened to them. Neither the US or UN ever doubted that he once had WMDs, the
only question was what happened to them. Hussein never properly accounted for
them, and US intelligence picked up suspicious behavior during Husseins cat and
mouse games with the UN, basically forcing the resulting military action. So
maybe US intelligence wasnt 100% accurate, that does not change Husseins
non-compliance with the cease fire he signed after the first gulf war, or all
those UN resolutions.
But what do I know, I want the Terminator to be my next governor,
Scott C.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
81 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|