Subject:
|
Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 04:49:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
334 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
| |
| |
It is time that all of the world’s tinpot leaders get the message that
supporting terrorism and terrorists will lead to their ruin.
|
That’s your reply?
|
My reply to what? You snipped the context thankyouverymuch. Bad form.
| |
It is absolutely a waste of time to discuss anything with
you -- a person that does nothing but reiterate the nonsensical and empty
platitudes of his favorite party.
|
Then pray tell why did you even reply to this post?
| |
If you could but once come here with a cite
from anyone with some degree of credibility, I might reconsider this opinion.
|
What a silly thing to say! As if providing “cites” bestows merit on a
particular post.
| |
As it stands, I think of you as the singular laughingstock of the newsgroup
-- you never come here with anything but these pointless statements. You
don’t provide links to any reputable source. You come here with nothing.
|
Sorry, Richard, if I don’t use this forum to restate other people’s ideas or
work instead of my presenting my own. Further, I happen to see this forum as a
place to debate and attack ideas, not individuals, as you apparently do. It’s
so funny how often discussions with you end with your assertion as to how dumb I
am and how presumably intellectual you are. What a burden it must be to have to
deal with such simpletons!
Having said all that-- what’s it to you anyway?
| |
If you don’t like the links and statements I occasionally provide here, don’t
read and don’t respond to them. A lot of what I post here is just tidbits of
news as it is presented from a variety of sources -- usually just a small
portion and a link to the complete story or op ed piece. And yes, sometimes I
provide my own succinct opinion. You merely react, never or rarely providing
an original action to which others might respond. If I didn’t post, you’d
have no one to bash -- and that’s just pathetic.
|
Have you forgotten about “Kooties”???
To be honest, I usually don’t respond to your posts-- I don’t have the time nor
the inclination to engage you that often. If you will recall, this thread
started by my asking you a pretty straightforward question-- I wasn’t really
looking for an argument at all.
But you are right; I don’t spend a lot of time here posting links to various
stories. I work for a living, and every second I spend here takes away from
getting that work done. Saylavee.
| |
If you must know, I find most of your replies extremely tedious -- which I
cannot say about any other poster in this newsgroup.
|
Well, I don’t recall asking, but thanks for sharing anyway.
| |
Everyone else brings
something to the forum -- even as little a thing as curiosity, or just
questions. Heck, a well formed, insightful question is the very heart of
rhetoric. With you, there is a pat biblical or republican answer for
everything. No thanks!
|
Did I say that? What exactly does that assertion even mean?
| |
From now on I will reply to your utter triteness by referencing this post
once it appears in the newsgroup. When you post a ZERO CONTENT statement
in the future, I will just point everyone here if I feel the urge to reply at
all.
|
lol You are arrogant! As if anyone even cares! Get over yourself already!
| |
I will now attempt to reply to your tiny statement above, even though it is
small both in meaning and spirit...
|
Only if it isn’t too tedious now...
| |
Go after the countries and organizations supporting terrorism? Puh-leaze!
That is not on the agenda, Sweetheart! If it were Saudi Arabia would be very
high on the list of targets for investigation and it is not.
|
Really? How do you know that it isn’t? What is “the agenda”? The fact is
that you don’t really know what you are talking about.
| |
Instead, we have
a lot of other micky mouse stuff going down. Catch a freaking clue,
seriously!
|
Ah, well thank you for that astute analysis, presumably large both in meaning
and spirit!
| |
Hopefully, the jig is up. I think Shrub’s poll numbers are dropping for all
of the obvious reasons. I enjoy these swings to the “ultra-right” only
inasmuch as they sometimes lead to nice liberal backlashes. And I mean
liberal as in free of the BS that has gone before it.
Or so I hope.
|
We shall see. And if it is not, you can always resort to ranting that the US is
full of idiots.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
81 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
