Debate : 21577


Off-Topic / Debate / 21577	21576 \| 21578

Subject:	Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2003 20:58:51 GMT
Viewed:	286 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote: > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: > > > > But that's not the issue. The issue is that Bush, Rumsfeld, Powell, and Rice > > > (among other admin officials and toadies) asserted that Saddam was an > > > active and immediate threat with an active chemical/biological weapons > > > program and an active nuclear agenda. Bush et al also claimed that Saddam > > > could be ready to attack the US within 45 minutes. Bush also claimed that > > > Saddam had remote-operated weapons capable of reaching the US. Here's a tidy compilation of most of my point: http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/8311 Dave!

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
(...) with those of its master. The 45 minute statement is a Blair thing: (URL) as noted earlier today. And as Kooties has noted elsewhere, the poodle and its master are meeting later in the week to get their mutual story straightened out and (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
(...) You make a good distinction. In the interest of fairness and disclosure, I offer some documentation of my assertion: Dubya's speech on 10/7/03 included the following statements: re: active biological/chemical weapons program: (...) and a (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

81 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search