To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21531
21530  |  21532
Subject: 
Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 11 Jul 2003 16:11:38 GMT
Viewed: 
298 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
  I failed to include my cite:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021007-8.html

And you believe that source? Obviously a Biased Source(tm), Dave!

  First you must demonstrate that it's obvious.
  Then you must demonstrate that it's biased.
  Then you must demonstrate that it's a source.

(also riffing on that previous joke (for those joining us late))

As to whether Harry Browne is running(2) again, let us hope not.

  I confess that I'll miss him, because he's such an easy target.  Not that he
helped the party at all...

2 - the first time I typed that word, in what surely is a completely
unrelated coincidence and not a freudian slip, it came out "ruining"...

  That's a riot!

    Dave!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
 
(...) As to whether Harry Browne is running(2) again, let us hope not. Yes, some Libertarians lie/cheat/steal... but we don't claim to be perfect, just forgiven... er wait, wrong tagline, try that again.... but we are actively working to make the (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

81 Messages in This Thread:



























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR