To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21569
21568  |  21570
Subject: 
Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:54:34 GMT
Viewed: 
347 times
  
  
   Right so after Afganistan, Saudi Arabia was the only country that we can actually prove did that.


We know Saudis perpetrated it; whether they were government sponsored or not is unclear.

And yet the Saudi government has done nothing.

   I tend to think not. OBL is a criminal in Saudi Arabia, and the Wahabi sect of Islam is just as dangerous to their way of life as it is to ours.

Yeah cause dictatorships are a “way of life” we actually care about protecting.

   We can agree to disagree here,

So what is the basis of your disagreement.

   but I am still waiting for a cite to your assertion about US aid to Palestinians compared to Israel.

Yeah its only been cited practiclly every time the Israel vs. Palestine subject comes up in off-topic.debate. Feel free to dig it up but I would have expected you to have learned that fact already from reading those posts.

  
   I mean the U.S. propaganda mass media make the public think they are in danger so they can control them, fear mongers.

What are you talking about here? US government propaganda, or mass media propaganda, or are they in concert together? And who is doing the controlling-- the US government or the mass media?

One and the same.

   If it is the Patriot Act that has your undies in a bunch, then I respectfully submit that that is another debate topic, although a good one: How does a free society protect itself against terrorism while preserving free rights for all. It is a very difficult question to answer I will freely admit, and I don’t necessarily defend the Patriot Act myself.

Well so far we have done nothing substaintially different than before 9/11. The Patriot Act is supposedly the answer. Which aslo happens to be the only thing threating our “way of life.”

  
  
   Let’s suppose that the attack on 9-11 was actually a nuclear bomb denotation. How would we have reacted differently than we did?

We probably would have wiped out most of the middle east.

I think you are just plain wrong in that assessment.

Why?

  
   Oh gee I don’t know how about actually educating them about what democracy is and such.

What do you suppose we are doing over there?

Stealing oil. What do you suppose we are doing over there?

   It is not as if there aren’t 1,000s of Iraqi expatriots who have been educated in the US and know all about freedom and democracy.

So where are all these people and why aren’t they fighting for freedom?

   Afganistan might be a different story though...

Why?

   You are correct that if he didn’t control a vast percentage of the world’s oil fields, we wouldn’t have cared as much. We need that oil.

No we don’t need it its just convenient.

   The Iraqi people need the money we pay them for that oil.

I’ll believe it when I see the Iraqi people benefiting from it.

   It is actually in both our interests that that flow continues.

Well so far its only been in our interests.

  
   I would belive that if we were actually trying to educate the people rather than simply control and/or contain them. Really that is only a few levels above what Saddam was doing.

You are mistaken as to what our mission is in that country.

I know what Bush said our mission was. I know what is actually happening. Actions speak far louder than words.
  
   Anyways all of it is a scam, much like the whole Y2K “problem” was. It is a method of keeping people in a state of fear. Not so much that they don’t go about their daily routine, but enough to keep most of them from asking questions. It is population control so the masses do not threaten those in power. Actions speak far louder than words, you just have to pay attention. The greatest threat to our country comes from our government not some mysterious phantom “terrorists.” We are no safer from terrorist attack today than we were 3 years ago but we are far more susceptible to blatant violation of the constitution by government agencies and police.

Well, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, but it sounds like paranoia and conspiracy theories to me.

So what do you think is wrong with my assesment? Simply stating that you disagree doesn’t really provide any useful information to try and change my mind.

-Mike Petrucelli



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
 
(...) Look, I don't claim to understand everything that is going on in Saudi Arabia. Do they sponsor terrorism? Maybe, but then why is OBL persona non grata in the Kingdom? Perhaps the right sheik doesn't know what the left sheik is sponsoring. I (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
 
(...) We know Saudis perpetrated it; whether they were government sponsored or not is unclear. I tend to think not. OBL is a criminal in Saudi Arabia, and the Wahabi sect of Islam is just as dangerous to their way of life as it is to ours. (...) We (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

81 Messages in This Thread:



























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR