To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 807
806  |  808
Subject: 
Re: Quoted/non-quoted ratio
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 08:00:02 GMT
Viewed: 
5512 times
  
Beaker <beaker@havoc.gtf.org> writes:

> [...]
> The problem with this is that any arbitrary line you draw will exclude
> some legitimate posts.  The goal here is obvious; you want to prevent
> posts that quote fifty or sixty lines of text in order to say 'me too'
> ... this is obnoxious, but it would require AI to filter it effectively
> without stepping on legitimate posts.  I can think of a number of
> situations where quoting 50 or 60 lines would be appropriate.  Trying to
> set a percentage, say, quoted text can amount to no more than 1.5x the
> original text, will run into similar problems.
> 
> I've always felt that trying to enforce this particular item of
> netiquette causes more problems than it solves.  For example, the very
> same people who are likely to quote an entire article to post a one-line
> response are the same people who, when confronted with a message that
> their post has been rejected due to quoted text, will just go back and
> add 70 or 80 blank lines.  You gain nothing.

Well put.  And good documentation for the record.  :)

It's an extremely difficult problem to solve correctly in a completely
mechanized way.

My questions to Matt were designed to highlight the difficulties and I hope
it didn't seem like I was anything but extremely skeptical.  :-)

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Quoted/non-quoted ratio
 
(...) :) yeah well. it was just a thought. (28 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Quoted/non-quoted ratio
 
Also sprach Todd Lehman: : How does it identify quoted stuff? Does it correctly handle >, |, +, and : : in all cases? (Not everyone uses >, unfortunately.) Good point. But '>' is not entirely standard. tin is about as venerable a newsreader as you (...) (28 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

80 Messages in This Thread:



























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR