Subject:
|
Re: Mailing list gateways
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 17:20:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2175 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman (lehman@javanet.com) wrote:
> blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes:
> > I think it's more like "we don't want the threads exposed to the world".
> > Of course, the major players are all there already -- you, Larry and
> > Mike.
>
> "exposed" meaning "poisoned" or "corrupted" or "affected" or "known" or
> "watched" or "commented on" or "muddied up"? :)
I would say "muddied up".
> If it means "known," what about lurking and/or participation from people
> inside TLG?
TLG and their software developers know about the list and participate in
a constructive way.
Play well,
Jacob
----------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: Jacob.Sparre.Andersen@risoe.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/> --
----------------------------------------------
LEGO: MOC+++c TO+++(6543) TC+++(8880) AQ+++ BV-- #++ S LS++ A-/+ YB72m
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| (...) "exposed" meaning "poisoned" or "corrupted" or "affected" or "known" or "watched" or "commented on" or "muddied up"? :) If it means "known," what about lurking and/or participation from people inside TLG? (...) I think (not positive) it's an (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
80 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
