Subject:
|
Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Jan 2001 21:45:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1732 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, John Koob writes:
> That's a large layout, compared to what we've had before.
> The large yard looks good too.
I've got some improvements to make - I'll post a new one soon.
> I'm not sure if I understand the incline. Is there going to be
> a gap between two tables for a two-level bridge?
> The cross-over idea is great, but the incline in the center of the
> long section means that anything behind it is somewhat obscured.
The incline is for the bridge to "cross-over the cross-over".
Vertically, there are three tracks in one place. Part of my
inpiration was a great 4.5V blue layout that I have in my memory
from a decades old LEGO photo. (I've got it at home somewhere.)
> Could you move the incline so that it spirals around (or inside?)
> the mountain? This way, it would appear that the incline serves
> some purpose.
Heheheh - Fine with me, but you'd better check with "the
mountaineers". I suspect a train spiral inside a mountain is
a bit more ambitious than they had anticipated...
I would like to run the elevated track portion over the
mountain - I'll let you suggest it to Kevin though... 8-)
SRC
StRuCtures
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
| (...) We can incorperate a line going along a mountain ridge without much difficulty. I'd prefer to beg off the elevation changes inside the mountain. (derails...*shudder*) BTW, John - do you still have a NALUG sign built? James (23 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
| | | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
| (...) OK - Here's the latest. I don't think the play area will be that large, but you get the idea. I was origianlly thinking of a three-sided layout facing the play area, but it leaves a huge empty area behind the layout. If I reverse/mirror (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
| That's a large layout, compared to what we've had before. The large yard looks good too. I'm not sure if I understand the incline. Is there going to be a gap between two tables for a two-level bridge? The cross-over idea is great, but the incline in (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
