Subject:
|
Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout - Mountain
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 06:26:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2634 times
|
| |
|
|
"James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> writes:
> I ran across another problem if we have an 'open C' style of layout - we need
> another bridge. The loop containing your arch can't come back around if our
> layout is open behind.
That's where the four tracks come from. The way Steve drew it the other
night, the main loop crossed over itself on the bridge, which of course
implies that it can't be "water" under the bridge.
--
Don't design inefficiency in - it'll happen in the implementation.
Chris Gray cg@ami-cg.GraySage.COM
http://www.GraySage.COM/cg/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout - Mountain
|
| (...) Hmm. I musta been out of the room at the time... If we're dispensing with the idea of the bridge going over anything, why not just run 3 continuous loops? (or in the case of an 'open C', 2 loops?) James (23 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
