Subject:
|
Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Jan 2001 04:12:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1937 times
|
| |
|
|
> > OK - Here's the latest...
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=26047
>
> Cool. The only problem I'd have with this is that there's nowhere
> "behind" the layout to be. Also, if we're about equi-distant from
> our layout and the play area, we may get involuntarily co-opted into
> some aspect of play area duty.
>
> I think I'd prefer the original horseshoe idea you were working with,
> backed against another layout, or a wall or something. It gives us
> a place to sit, or put our jackets or lunch, or whatever. It also
> means we aren't between crowds and the scenery.
I agree with you on all points, but don't you think 750 sq. ft.
with nothing in it but us and our coats will look silly?
SRC
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
| SRC wrote in message ... (...) You lost me. How do you come up with 750 sq ft. if the layout is moved away from a wall by a few feet? Perhaps a diagram would help ... -- John (remove the obvious to reply) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
| (...) the layout to be. Also, if we're about equi-distant from our layout and the play area, we may get involuntarily co-opted into some aspect of play area duty. I think I'd prefer the original horseshoe idea you were working with, backed against (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
