Subject:
|
Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout - Mountain
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 04:52:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2600 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Steve Chapple writes:
> I was trying some layouts in my head yesterday after our Saturday
> get together and realized two problems with the mountain as it stands.
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=28154 (The cross
> tracks represent the bridge.) Number the tracks 1,2,3,4 from top to
> bottom. As of Sat. we had 1 @ 2 (bricks high) 2 @ 0, 3 @ 16, and
> 4 @ 0 with 2, 3, & 4 enclosed and 1 outside.
I ran across another problem if we have an 'open C' style of layout - we need
another bridge. The loop containing your arch can't come back around if our
layout is open behind.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout - Mountain
|
| (...) That's where the four tracks come from. The way Steve drew it the other night, the main loop crossed over itself on the bridge, which of course implies that it can't be "water" under the bridge. (23 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout - Mountain
|
| I was trying some layouts in my head yesterday after our Saturday get together and realized two problems with the mountain as it stands. (URL) (The cross tracks represent the bridge.) Number the tracks 1,2,3,4 from top to bottom. As of Sat. we had 1 (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
