Subject:
|
Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Jan 2001 22:36:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1869 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Steve Chapple writes:
> In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, John Koob writes:
> > Could you move the incline so that it spirals around (or inside?)
> > the mountain? This way, it would appear that the incline serves
> > some purpose.
>
> Heheheh - Fine with me, but you'd better check with "the
> mountaineers". I suspect a train spiral inside a mountain is
> a bit more ambitious than they had anticipated...
> I would like to run the elevated track portion over the
> mountain - I'll let you suggest it to Kevin though... 8-)
We can incorperate a line going along a mountain ridge without much
difficulty. I'd prefer to beg off the elevation changes inside the
mountain. (derails...*shudder*)
BTW, John - do you still have a NALUG sign built?
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
| James Brown wrote in message ... (...) Great. (...) I was thinking of a mountain with an open back, but if it's enclosed, you're right. (...) Yup. Don't have a need to rip it apart anytime soon. It's all white and red bricks--two colors which I (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
| (...) I've got some improvements to make - I'll post a new one soon. (...) The incline is for the bridge to "cross-over the cross-over". Vertically, there are three tracks in one place. Part of my inpiration was a great 4.5V blue layout that I have (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
